Robotic radical prostatectomy: analysis of midterm pathologic and oncologic outcomes: A historical series from a high-volume center.

BACKGROUND: Identifying predictors of positive surgical margins (PSM) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) may assist clinicians in formulating prognosis. Aim of the study was to report the midterm oncologic outcomes, to identify the risk factors for PSM and BCR and assess the impact of the PSM on BCR-free survival following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). METHODS: From 2005 to 2010, 1679 consecutive patients underwent transperitoneal RALP. Data was retrospectively collected by an independent statistical company and analyzed in 2014. Median postoperative follow-up was 33.5 mo. BCR was defined as any detectable serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 0.2 ng/mL in two consecutive measurements. BCR-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analysis were applied to identify risk factors for PSM and BCR. RESULTS: In pN0/pNx cancers, pathologic stage was pT2 in 1186 patients (71.8%), pT3 in 455 patients (27.6%), and pT4 in 11 patients (0.6%). PSM rate was 17.4% and 36.9% of pT2 and pT3 cancers, respectively. Pathologic Gleason score was < 7, = 7 and > 7 in 42.1%, 53% and 4.9% of the patients, respectively. Overall BCR-free survival was 73.1% at 5 years; the 5-year BCR-free survival was 87.9% for pT2 with negative surgical margins. PSA, Gleason score (both bioptic and pathologic), pathologic stage (pT) and surgeon's volume were significant independent predictors of PSM. PSA, pathologic Gleason score, pT and PSM were significant independent predictors of BCR-free survival. Seminal vesicle-sparing, nerve-sparing approach and the extent of nerve-sparing (intra vs interfascial dissection) did not negatively affect margin status or BCR rates. CONCLUSIONS: PSMs are a predictor of BCR. Being the only modifiable factor influencing the PSM rate, surgical experience is confirmed as a key factor for high-quality oncologic outcomes.

Nerve Sparing, Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Bladder Substitution in the Male.

PURPOSE: We provide a step-by-step description of our technique of nerve and seminal vesicle sparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with an orthotopic neobladder. We also present preliminary oncologic and functional outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nerve and seminal vesicle sparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with a modified Y-shaped orthotopic neobladder was performed by the same surgeon in 40 men with clinically localized bladder cancer from January 2011 to September 2014. Operative, perioperative and pathological data as well as continence and erectile function outcomes are presented. RESULTS: Median followup was 26.5 months (range 8 to 52). A soft tissue positive surgical margin was found in a patient with pT3a disease. A global rate of 30% early and 32.5% late complications was observed. However, the grade III or higher complication rate was low in both settings at 2.5% and 5%, respectively. There was 1 cancer related death 23 months after surgery. Of the 40 patients 30 (75%) gained daytime continence (0 pad) within 1 month postoperatively. The 12-month nocturnal continence rate was 72.5% (29 of 40 patients). Mean preoperative IIEF-6 (International Index of Erectile Function-6) score was 24.4. Erectile function returned to normal, defined as an IIEF-6 score greater than 17, in 31 of 40 patients (77.5%) within 3 months while 29 of 40 patients (72.5%) returned to the preoperative IIEF-6 score within 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In the hands of an experienced surgeon nerve and seminal vesicle sparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction of the neobladder seems feasible and safe. It provides short-term oncologic efficacy and promising functional outcomes. Yet comparative, long-term followup studies with standard open cystectomy are required.

[Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Contribution of robotic support, functional and oncological outcomes]. / Prostatectomie radicale mini-invasive : apport de l'assistance robotisée, résultats fonctionnels et oncologiques.

OBJECTIVES: Radical prostatectomy (RP) remains a standard for localized prostate cancer treatment. The objective of this study is to present this operating technique of the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (PR-RA) and to evaluate oncological and functional results as well as on the surgical safety. METHODS: A first series of 1679 patients consecutively operated in our institution with this technique from 2005 to 2010 and with a 5-year follow-up evaluated in 2014. The oncology monitoring is ensured with a PSA test every six months during the first three years and once a year the years after if the level remains undetectable. RESULTS: The oncologic outcomes show 17.4% for pT2 stages and 36.9% for pT3 stages positive margins. The level of biological recurrence is 21.27% with an average delay of 88 months as the time needed for the recurrence to occur. At 12 months, urinary continence (0-1pad/day) returned at 94% of all patients and potency with successful penetration for all men is 61.1% and 88.8% for men with sexual activity before surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The technique PRRA seems to be a reliable technique whose functional results studied from meta-analysis seem to be superior in terms of rapidity of recovery of the continence and erection in comparison with classical surgical or laparoscopic approach.

Laparoscopic pretransplant nephrectomy with morcellation in autosomic-dominant polycystic kidney disease patients with end-stage renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) in end-stage autosomic-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) requires a large abdominal incision for the specimen extraction. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe our technique of LN for end-stage ADPKD followed by morcellation (LNM) of the specimen and extraction through a minimal abdominal incision. METHODS: The medical records of 19 consecutive patients who underwent pretransplant LNM between 2008 and 2011 by a single experienced laparoscopic surgeon were analyzed. Morcellation was performed with the Gynecare Morcellex™ Tissue morcellator, Ethicon. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All cases but one were completed laparoscopically. Mean specimen weight was 1,026.8 g. Mean duration of the procedure, estimated blood loss, and hospital stay were 131.3 min, 52.1 ml, and 7.9 days, respectively. Specimens were extracted through a 12-mm trocar in 10/18 patients and through a 3-cm incision in 9/18 cases. Postoperatively, three complications were observed (Clavien grades II, I, and II). The only case of incisional hernia was observed in the converted procedure. Major limitation of the study is its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: In our preliminary series and in the hands of a very experienced laparoscopist, LNM for ADPKD appears as a modern, mini-invasive, and safe technique. Specimen's extraction through a small abdominal incision reduces postoperative pain and incisional hernias and guarantees the final cosmetic result of laparoscopy. The reduced overall morbidity could reduce the period between nephrectomy and transplantation.

Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: comparison of pentafecta rates for a single surgeon.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the pentafecta rates between laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) and to identify prognostic factors predicting the pentafecta for each technique. METHODS: This prospective comparative study enrolled 248 consecutive male patients 70 years of age or younger with clinically localized prostate cancer [PCa: age ≤ 70 years, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 10 ng/ml, biopsy Gleason score ≤ 7] who were fully continent, potent, and candidates for bilateral nerve-sparing (BNS) LRP or RALP. The pentafecta rates between LRP and RALP were compared. A logistic regression model was created to evaluate independent factors for achieving pentafecta. RESULTS: In the final analysis, 91 LRP and 136 RALP patients were evaluated. The median follow-up period was 21 months for the 91 LRP patients and 18 months for the 136 RALP patients (p = 0.07). Of the 227 patients, 87 reached pentafecta [25 LRP patients (27.5 %) vs 62 RALP patients (45.6 %), p = 0.006]. Of the 140 patients who failed pentafecta, 90 (64.3 %) missed a single parameter. In these cases, erectile deficit was the leading cause of pentafecta failure, with a significant [corrected] difference between groups (80 % LRP cases that missed potency recovery [corrected] vs 53.3 % RALP, p = 0.007). Lower age, lower pathologic stage, and RALP are significantly associated with pentafecta as independent factors. For the pT3 disease, the two techniques did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Patients submitted to BNS RP have low possibilities of achieving pentafecta. Use of the robotic platform by a single surgeon significantly enhances the possibility of achieving pentafecta independently of age and pathologic stage. Potency was the most difficult outcome to reach after surgery, and it was the main factor leading to pentafecta failure. LRP and RALP provide equivalent pentafecta rates for the pT3 disease and similar "tetrafecta" outcomes when potency recovery is not included among the postoperative expectations of the patient.

The surgical treatment of a large prostatic adenoma: the laparoscopic approach--a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To present a critical overview of the current literature on the role of laparoscopy for the surgical treatment of patients with large prostatic adenomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MedLine search for peer-reviewed studies on laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP) was performed. The clinical studies that reported most of the following information were included: number of patients, prostate volume, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and the duration of catheterization, as well as functional outcomes and complications. Articles reporting a mean total prostate volume of <80 mL or a mean prostatic adenoma of <60 mL were excluded. The review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: Fourteen articles on LSP were included in this systematic review with a total of 626 patients treated. Both transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches, as well as transvesical and transcapsular routes, have been described. Eleven articles were case-series and three were comparative retrospective nonrandomized studies. When compared with open simple prostatectomy (OP), LSP is associated with a less blood loss and a reduced irrigation requirement, a shorter postoperative catheterization period, and a shorter hospital stay, at the expense of an extended operative time. The limited number of patients treated, the selection biases due to the retrospective nature of several published articles on LSP, and the short follow-up periods are evident limits of the literature. I-square test demonstrated a high heterogeneity (93%) and consequently a high variability in the intervention effects in terms of maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax). CONCLUSIONS: Even if LSP seems feasible and safe, there is still limited evidence regarding its long-term outcomes compared with OP.

Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) is an important gap of the literature related to the surgical treatment of the clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). AIM: To provide the first prospective randomized comparison on the functional and oncological outcomes of LRP and RALRP for the treatment of the clinically localized PCa. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2008, 128 consecutive male patients were randomized in two groups and treated by a single experienced surgeon with traditional LRP (Group I-64 patients) or RALRP (Group II-64 patients) in all cases with intent of bilateral intrafascial nerve sparing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point was to compare the 12 months erectile function (EF) outcomes. Complication rates, continence outcomes, and oncological results were also compared. The sample size of our study was able, with an adequate power (1-beta > 0.90), to recognize as significant large differences (above 0.30) between incidence proportions of considered outcomes. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed for operating time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, complications, rates of positive surgical margins, rates of biochemical recurrence, continence, and time to continence. However, the 12-month evaluation of capability for intercourse (with or without phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors) showed a clear and significant advantage of RALRP (32% vs. 77%, P < 0.0001). Time to capability for intercourse was significantly shorter for RALRP. Rates of return to baseline International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6) EF domain score questionnaires (questions 1-5 and 15) (25% vs. 58%) and to IIEF-6 > 17 (38% vs. 63%) were also significantly higher for RALRP (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study offers the first high-level evidence that RALRP provides significantly better EF recovery than LRP without hindering the oncologic radicality of the procedure. Larger RCTs are needed to confirm if a new gold-standard treatment in the field of RP has risen.

Complete periprostatic anatomy preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP): the new pubovesical complex-sparing technique.

BACKGROUND: Puboprostatic ligament preservation has been proposed as a method to accelerate continence recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, these ligaments present anatomic continuity with the bladder, and there must be interruption at some point to expose the prostatourethral junction. OBJECTIVES: To describe the surgical steps of pubovesical complex (PVC)-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic RP (RALP) and present the preliminary results of our technique. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirty PVC-sparing RALP procedures were performed in patients <60 yr with clinically localised prostate cancer between 2007 and 2009 by the same surgeon. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: The principles of bladder neck preservation, tension and energy-free dissection of the bundles as well as seminal vesicle sparing are applied. Ventrally, a plane of dissection is developed between the detrusor apron and the prostate. The soft connective tissue between Santorini's plexus and the prostate is blandly dissected, leaving the plexus intact and in place. MEASUREMENTS: The rates and location of positive surgical margins (PSM) as well as functional outcomes are presented. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Three of 30 patients (10%) had a PSM (two apical margins and one on the left posterolateral side). At catheter removal, 24 of 30 patients (80%) were dry (0 pads), and 6 of 30 patients (20%) needed one security pad. After 3 mo, 22 of 30 patients (73%) presented an International Index of Erectile Function score >17 (with or without phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors). Thirteen of 22 potent patients had an Erection Hardness Score of 3, and 9 of 22 patients had a score of 4. Small sample size, low mean age of enrolled patients (52 yr), and the absence of diseases that could impair the continence and potency recovery are some of the limitations of the study. Moreover, it is difficult to quantify the effect of each applied continence-sparing technique. CONCLUSIONS: The holistic preservation of the PVC during RALP is technically feasible. It leads towards an absolute preservation of the periprostatic anatomy that may enhance early functional outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.